Envenio t/a The Casting Suite – ASA Informal Adjudication 20J un 07

Home Forums General Envenio t/a The Casting Suite – ASA Informal Adjudication 20J un 07

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #263911
    Joe Rispoli
    Member

    Informal ASA Adjudication dated 20 June 2007
    Envenio t/a The Casting Suite
    1 Dean’s Yard
    London
    SW1 P 3NP
    Case number: A07-21671
    Media: Leaflet
    Sector: Employment
    Number of complaints: 1
    Ad
    A leaflet, for a casting agency, was headlined “The entertainment agency needs people” and stated “Envenio has over 5000 registered clients in the entertainment industry who look for models, actors and extras”
    Issue
    The complainant challenged the claim “Envenio has over 5000 registered clients in the entertainment industry”.
    Response
    Envenio provided their registered client list which included the name, company and e-mail address for each client as well as their username and password for the Envenio website. There were over 5,000 names on the list.
    Envenio said they had no plans to use the ad again.
    Assessment
    Upheld
    The ASA noted the client list included over 5,000 names. However, we noted some of the names were not attributed to a specific company and in some cases several names were listed-for the same company, for example over 300 names were listed for the BBC and over 100 for a leading ad agency. In addition a few names were listed under Envenio s trading name The Casting Suite.
    We contacted twenty of the listed clients via e-mail. Although we received eight responses from people on the list who confirmed that they were registered clients of Envenio, eight of the e-mails were undeliverable and two respondents said they had never been clients of Envenio. We therefore concluded that although some of the people on the list were genuine registered clients, several contacts may have been out of date, or been added even though they had not agreed to register with Envenio.
    We considered that Envenio had failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim “over 5000 registered clients” and we concluded, therefore, that the claim was likely to mislead.
    The ad breached CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation) and 7.1 (Truthfulness).
    Action
    We told Envenio not to repeat the claim “over 5,000 registered clients” unless they had sufficient evidence to substantiate it. We advised them to seek guidance from the CAP Copy Advice team for their future ads.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.